On 4 May 2026, the International Court of Justice opened public hearings on the merits in Guyana v Venezuela, formally titled Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 (Guyana v Venezuela). The hearings, scheduled until 11 May 2026, concern the legal validity and effect of the 1899 Arbitral Award, which fixed the boundary between the former Colony of British Guiana and Venezuela.

On 28 April 2026, Trial Chamber X of the International Criminal Court delivered its reparations order for victims in Al Hassan, the Mali case formally known as The Prosecutor v. Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Mohamed Ag Mahmoud.

The Rome Statute is the founding treaty of the International Criminal Court, the first permanent treaty-based court created to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression.

The genocide case against Israel brought by South Africa before the International Court of Justice is one of the most important legal proceedings under the Genocide Convention since Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro and The Gambia v Myanmar.

The UAE leaves OPEC at a moment when Gulf oil politics can no longer be separated from war, maritime insecurity, and strategic competition among producer states. The decision is not merely a technical change in institutional membership. It marks a shift in the way the United Arab Emirates seeks to use energy policy as an instrument of national power.

The protection of journalists in armed conflict lies at the intersection of civilian protection, military operations, public accountability, and control over wartime information. Journalists document facts that parties to conflict may prefer to conceal, including civilian casualties, detention practices, sieges, forced displacement, attacks on protected objects, and alleged international crimes.

The Netanyahu ICC Arrest Warrant raises a direct legal question: must States Parties to the Rome Statute arrest Benjamin Netanyahu if he enters their territory while the warrant remains in force? The issue is not only political or diplomatic.

The Duterte ICC Trial places one of the most contested questions in modern international criminal law before the International Criminal Court: when can a domestic law-enforcement campaign become a crime against humanity?

The Minab School Strike has already emerged as one of the most legally significant incidents reported during the 2026 Iran war. On 28 February 2026, during the opening phase of joint United States and Israeli attacks on Iran, the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab was struck during school hours.

Gender-Based Violence is one of the clearest tests of whether international human rights law can protect people against systematic harm rather than isolated abuse. It is not a marginal issue within the legal order.

The Right to Nationality is one of the basic legal guarantees of contemporary international law because it defines the formal bond between the individual and the State. That bond is not merely symbolic.

The Margin of appreciation is one of the most important doctrines in European human rights law because it addresses a basic problem within the European Convention on Human Rights: how can a supranational court enforce common rights standards across states with different constitutional traditions, moral outlooks, political priorities, and social conditions?