top of page

The Peace of Westphalia and the International Relations

Writer's picture: Edmarverson A. SantosEdmarverson A. Santos

The Thirty Years' War (1618-1648) and the overlapping Eighty Years' War (1568-1648) ravaged the European continent, leaving death and destruction in their wake. Emerging from this chaos, the Peace of Westphalia established groundbreaking principles for international politics that still influence diplomacy and state affairs today.


Signed in 1648, the Peace of Westphalia was an attempt to end decades of religious and political conflict through a negotiated settlement. Though fighting continued amidst the negotiations, delegates from across Europe persisted, recognizing that compromise was necessary to avert further devastation. The resulting treaties, while imperfect, introduced concepts that brought about profound change in interstate relations.


This revolutionary peace established precedents for religious tolerance, alternatives to warfare for dispute resolution, and the sovereignty of states in international affairs. Its effects continue to reverberate, providing the foundation for institutions like the United Nations while shifting views on the legitimacy of warfare. This seminal moment marked the genesis of the modern nation-state system.



The Peace of Westphalia


Causes of the Conflicts


Tensions between Catholics and Protestants simmered in the Holy Roman Empire since Martin Luther ushered in the Protestant Reformation in 1517. Religious divisions continued to grow in the early 1600s as Calvinism spread and German princes adopted the new faiths against the wishes of the Catholic Emperor.


These religious tensions overlapped and intertwined with political struggles as the princes chafed under imperial interference in their domains. Conflict erupted in 1618 when rebellious Protestant nobility in Bohemia defied the Emperor and triggered the Bohemian Revolt.


The revolt sparked the Thirty Years’ War, drawing in Catholic powers like Spain and initially successful Protestant states like Denmark and Sweden. Political opportunism also brought Catholic France into the conflict, wooing Protestant German princes into an alliance against the imperial forces of the Holy Roman Emperor.


This widened the war into a continental affair, devastating lands, and towns caught between marching armies while murderous rampages and disease inflicted further casualties across civilian populations. The Dutch Revolt also raged on in the Eight Years’ War, as the northern Protestants stubbornly maintained their bid for independence from Catholic Spanish masters.


By 1642, war-weariness slowly brought parties to the negotiating table, though clashes continued. All sides recognized the wars’ immense toll, yet securing acceptable peace terms remained complex given the array of political and religious stakeholders vying to shape the outcome.


The Congress of Westphalia


Peace negotiations commenced in 1642, initially amounting to little amidst ongoing warfare. Delegates could not even agree on where to gather, with separate talks spanning the neighboring towns of Osnabrück for Protestant interests and Münster for Catholic-leaning parties.


Key figures for the primary war included Count Maximilian von Trauttmansdorff of Austria for the Holy Roman Emperor, the Catholic League, Count Johan Oxenstierna of Sweden, and Marquis Charles d’Avaux of France, representing French and Swedish Protestant allies. Spanish envoys were also involved, given their entanglement in the Dutch Revolt.


Territorial losses and rights for German princes proved sticking points, threatening negotiations over the years. Religious issues also loomed large, given confessional tensions underlying the Empire’s turmoils. By 1645, war-weariness led Sweden and France to temper demands, but the Emperor’s drive for dominance still obstructed compromises.


Finally, in 1648, military setbacks compelled Austria to adopt more flexibility regarding Calvinist recognition and princely privileges. Agreement slowly emerged on issues like allowing Calvinism in the Empire alongside existing peace terms afforded Lutherans and Catholics after the Peace of Augsburg.


This religious compromise and recognition of expanded provincial powers laid the foundation for the resulting Peace. While imperial, Spanish, and French interests still squabbled over various territorial concessions well into October, the treaties were finally signed on October 24, 1648.


Terms of the Peace


The Peace of Westphalia, encompassing the joined treaties of Münster and Osnabrück, instituted terms that brought conflict between the Holy Roman Empire and other European powers to an end.


The treaties reaffirmed previous religious settlements granted after the Peace of Augsburg in 1555, which had formally recognized the Lutheran faith. The Peace of Westphalia solidified this religious tolerance, now also allowing the practice of Calvinism in the Empire.


Politically, the treaties affirmed the independence of the United Provinces of the Netherlands from Spanish control, though the Southern Netherlands remained under Spanish rule. Within the Holy Roman Empire, the treaties granted extensive autonomous control to the German princes who ruled over the various provinces and cities.


While still nominally under imperial authority, the princes were now recognized as sovereigns able to determine the religion of their territories. Their territories were also deemed sovereign possessions in regard to diplomatic relations and military agreements. In exchange, the German states pledged to avoid armed conflicts between each other in the future.


Though Austria and Sweden made additional territorial concessions during the negotiations, the religious compromises and recognition of princely autonomy established the foundation for the overarching peace. These seminal provisions brought an end to decades of empire-wide conflicts.


Effects on International Relations


The Peace of Westphalia established groundbreaking principles for the conduct of international affairs, formally recognizing new norms that still influence interstate relations today.


Most notably, the Peace enshrined religious tolerance as an element of international treaties and domestic sovereignty. Rulers could determine the faith of their domains based on their own determinations, not external authorities. This concept of religious self-determination became widely accepted.


Additionally, the negotiations demonstrated that diplomacy could serve as an alternative to warfare for resolving disputes between powers. Compromise through Congress represented a novel model for statecraft among the emerging nation-states of Europe.


Just as importantly, the Peace cemented sovereignty itself as the fundamental basis for these fledgling nation-states. Although the Holy Roman Emperor retained titular authority, the territories of the German princes were affirmed as sovereign possessions with expanding privileges. The modern conception of a sovereign state took form.


The Westphalian model implanted these foundational norms of diplomacy and sovereignty into the DNA of the international system, establishing the genesis of today's global order of nation-states. The structure and principles of bodies like the United Nations directly descend from this seminal event.


Three and a half centuries later, religiosity plays little role in international affairs, and diplomacy is the default for dispute resolution. State sovereignty also remains central, despite contemporary challenges from globalization. For today and the foreseeable future, the Peace of Westphalia and subsequent treaties following its model provide the bedrock for international relations.


Conclusion


The Peace of Westphalia marked a seminal moment that ended the Thirty Years' War and the Eighty Years' War. Beyond that immediate outcome, the treaties established precedents and introduced concepts that profoundly changed interstate relations in Europe and across the globe.


This Peace represented one of the first instances of a diplomatic congress resolving complex religious, territorial, and political disputes between diverse combatants through negotiated compromise rather than battlefield victories alone. The model of compromise diplomacy set the stage for future international agreements.


More broadly, the terms affirmed principles of religious tolerance, alternatives to constant warfare, and state sovereignty that reverberate from 1648 down to today's age. The Peace codified Westphalian sovereignty, recognizing states' rights to political self-determination and non-intervention from external actors.


While religious uniformity and warfare persist worldwide in defiance of those pioneering ideals in some instances, the norms introduced by the Peace of Westphalia gave rise to the current international order. Contemporary institutions like the United Nations operate upon the foundations Europe laid in the aftermath of its 17th-century conflagrations.


Nearly four hundred years later, statesmen and diplomats continue their Westphalian predecessors' work, grappling with new and old disputes through Congress rather than combat. The revolutionary concepts born from a singular moment of destructive but creative potential in 1648 still offer guidance today.

Logo.png
  • LinkedIn
bottom of page